 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obey Me to the Letter 
May 6, 1994 4:00a.m. My child, obey Me to the letter (the others will know they disobeyed Me). I am God. I am speaking to you. You have no hate or anger or anxiousness for any man. I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God. I need you to do this work. You write as I dictate. You will not know what is My plan. I am God and I can change all things. I do not change a man's free will. I tell each one to obey. If he does not, then he will be held accountable. You did as you were told. In no way does My letter conflict with My mother's messages. A decision was made to ignore My words. This displeases Me greatly! I want obedience. You did exactly as I told you and I continue to expect obedience from you. I will enkindle this. You do not fret or fume. Your job is to deliver a message. I am Jesus and I am giving you personal love letters for My beloved children. I do not hold one letter better than another. I am Jesus. I have spoken. I have been disobeyed. You continue to do exactly as I tell you. If they laugh or give you a hard time, you continue to obey Me exactly as I tell you. I am God and I have spoken. My ways I make clear to you. I am offended by this decision. You show no ill will. I am God and I will tend to all else. You only obey Me. Write these messages and give them to Father S____. These are messages from the Son of God. They are to be heeded. If you do not obey Me, then you are choosing on your own to disobey. One message is not better than another. My message did not conflict with My mother's messages. It was a decision that this letter of Mine should not be put out. I stated specifically that I wanted it out. My children are hurting and they need these messages. I write so tenderly of My love! These messages will save souls. My mother's purpose is to draw men's hearts to Me. I wanted My message given out at the farm. You must obey Me. You must continue to obey Me. Souls will suffer for not hearing the message. I want them to know of My love. You continue to do exactly as I command you to do. I ask, you can choose to obey or not obey. I am talking here. I want to be obeyed. I want My letters to reach My beloved ones! http://www.sofc.org/ Posted via email from deaconjohn's posterous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASIA/SOUTH KOREA - Seoul (Agenzia Fides) – With affirming its no to abortion, a practice now conducted legally and illegally in Korea, the Korean Bishops' Conference Commission for Bioethics has expressed its public support for the anti-abortion campaign being led by pro-life organizations, many of which have Korean doctors and obstetricians among them.
The organizations have released a statement, sent to Agenzia Fides, in which they declare their concern for the abortions occurring both legally and illegally, calling on all society to stop these practices against the lives of the unborn.
“The Bishops' Conference welcomes and approves of this courageous stance being taken by doctors and abortions against abortion. We hope that their decision may be an occasion for the public to start shedding light on the mystery of human life and build a culture of life,” the Commission affirms in a note sent to Fides. “Human life should be respected and safeguarded from conception until natural death. In confronting the questions of abortion and destruction of embryos, our society often remains silent and passive. Thus, we appreciate the appeal of the doctors and obstetricians, who make their voice heard through the anti-abortion movement.”
According to the Korean Bishops, “given that the government has the duty to protect its citizens, it should do so as well in the case of unborn children, removing the part of the Document on maternal and child care that is in fact a promotion of abortion.” In addition, the Commission says, all Koreans should begin a profound reflection on value and respect for human life.
Abortion has been legal in South Korea since 1972. However, the illegal practice of selective abortions has become widespread among families who only want sons. According to data from the pro-life movement “Life 31” there are 4,000 abortions every day in South Korea, and thus, over 1.5 million children who are never born each year. (PA) (Agenzia Fides 6/11/2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement Regarding Cardinal Rigali's Memo Protecting 'Status Quo' on Life
WASHINGTON, Nov. 7 /Christian Newswire/ -- American Life League president Judie Brown released the following statement on the news that Cardinal Justin Rigali will support Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962), provided an amendment preserving the status quo for abortion is voted upon.
"Our Catholic bishops should be fearlessly leading the way towards a culture of life. Fighting to maintain a status quo credited to the destruction of 51 million preborn children is wrong and confusing to 65 million Catholics united in the defense of life.
"What Cardinal Rigali has permitted by way of political maneuvering is to allow an amendment to be heard and watch it be defeated. While our Catholic bishops will scramble to define their opposition to abortion in the aftermath, Pelosi will wave Rigali's support for health care reform as evidence that lay Catholics would somehow be wrong in opposing her bill.
"In endorsing Pelosicare, our Catholic bishops have risked making themselves political pawns in advancing a culture of death that treats human life as disposable.
"Once again, this incrementalist approach to abortion will serve to enshrine in law grave injustices condemned unequivocally by the Catholic Church. Among these are rationed health care, In vitro fertilization, embryonic stem cell research, human experimentation, euthanasia and birth control.
"Faithful Catholics have a responsibility to vigorously oppose abortion in healthcare, not negotiate the status quo.
"Our bishops, when they negotiate anything less than the full protection all human beings deserve, undermine the very principles of the Catholic Faith and destroy the confidence of faithful Catholics across America.
"Our Catholic bishops should point to the unchanging principles and doctrines of the Catholic Faith, not negotiate a status quo that ends human lives. Today's letter abrogates those principles. Americans should know that a truly Catholic position on health care protects human life at all stages and at all times.
"Negotiation on truth is never a Catholic principle. Truth alone should inform the consciences of faithful Catholics, and truth demands the full protection of human life."
i>American Life League was cofounded in 1979 by Judie Brown. It is the largest grassroots Catholic pro- life organization in the United States and is committed to the protection of all innocent human beings from the moment of creation to natural death. For more information or press inquiries, please contact Katie Walker at 540.659.4942.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Politico: Bishops sign off on deal as vote nears (07 November 2009)www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29262.html USCCB: Bishops To House: Keep Abortion Funding Out Of Health Care Reform, Make Health Care Available To Vulnerable (06 November 2009) www.usccb.org/comm/archives/2009/09- 228.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contradicts Politico report, "Bishops Endorse the Bill" Update (1:30pm EST): Politico Live Pulse has changed its headline to "Bishops Endorse the Amendment."
By Kathleen Gilbert WASHINGTON, D.C., November 7, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A USCCB spokesman has confirmed that, while the U.S. Bishops have lauded House lawmakers for allowing a vote on the pro-life Stupak amendment, the nascent rumor that this amounts to an endorsement of the bill is false. This morning, Politico's Live Pulse announced news of the USCCB communication praising the vote on the amendment with the headline "Bishops Endorse the Bill," going on to say that the bishops "delivered a critical endorsement to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi." But LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) this morning asked Richard Doerflinger, the associate director of the USCCB's pro-life secretariat, whether it was accurate to say that the bishops support the health care bill. "Not without the Stupak amendment," Doerflinger stated. However, if the Stupak amendment passes, he added, it would eliminate "our most serious moral problem with the bill." "We do generally support health care reform ... but our focus right now is on supporting the Stupak/Pitts amendment," he said. "We certainly don't [support the bill] now, because the Stupak amendment is absent. "I did hear a rumor that I was quashing that we support the bill with or without, and that is definitely not true." The opinion of the USCCB, which represents about 300 active Catholic bishops in the United States, has been closely watched as a primary litmus test for lawmakers conscientious of pro-life values amid Capitol Hill's health care wrangling. Following eleventh-hour discussions with legislators on the abortion vote, Cardinal Justin Rigali of the USCCB's Pro-Life Secretariat issued a letter to lawmakers confirming that, "Passing this amendment allows the House to meet our criteria of preserving the existing protections against abortion funding in the new legislation." "The Conference will remain vigilant and involved through this entire process to assure that these essential provisions are maintained and included in the final legislation," says the letter. The Stupak/Pitts amendment, recently approved for a floor vote scheduled for today in a surprise move by the House Rules Committee, would restore long-standing federal policy on abortion in the bill by banning using government-appropriated funds for elective abortions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
deaconjohn1987's journal
Previous
